Perhaps the most positive  result from this year’s adventure is that now, equipped with my little water  bottle, an emergency apple and my trusty satnav I can hurl myself up and down  motorways without a second thought.   Before I started this project, I regarded any drive of over five miles as  a major undertaking, to be agonised over for several days, and then avoided if  at all possible by any means fair or foul.   Once a year, I would announce I was Going On A Trip and, starting out at  five in the morning, when I hoped everyone else would still be in bed, I would  drive at a steady forty miles an hour until I reached my destination.  Whoever I was visiting would be astounded  that I had managed to arrive there in only ten hours, and it would take me three  days to recover.  Those days are  gone.  I am experienced  now.
So it was with only a  moderate amount of trepidation that I faced the long, long drive to my latest  adventure.  I had been waiting for this  the whole year.  Two days of training run  by National Rational.  Playing with the  Big Kids at last.  Time to talk to People  who Know Stuff.  I was  excited.
I decided to arrive the  evening before the training, taking the opportunity to visit Old Chum.  It rained relentlessly for the first two  hours of my journey.  The motorway was  like a paddling pool and quite terrifying.   So much for developing motoring confidence.  We had our usual chummy chat (‘So what the  **** is it you are up to, you nutter?’) and a very good  cake.
The next morning, satnav  delivered me bright and early to a small huddle of houses in sodden  farmland.  I drove around a couple of  times, parked in the grounds of the largest building I could find, decided it  was a private house, ran away and drove around again.  This time, I found the venue, and after only  two or three attempts, I managed to park quite neatly.  
We were to be housed in an  outdoor pursuits centre; a building mostly accustomed to witnessing ten year  olds drawing willies and tearing their waterproofs.  There were brightly coloured posters on the  walls and we had dorms with bunk beds to sleep in!  I had an urge to play at Mallory Towers.  It was quite charming, but the classroom was  freezing cold.  I guess most people using  it would not be sitting still for as long as we did.  By eleven o’clock, I had to apply an extra  layer of clothing.  The pashmina is by  far the best fruit of civilisation.   Forget cats’ eyes, forget medicine, forget the microchip; I am voting for  the big scarf.
I was surprised and  disconcerted to find that my fellow trainees were all more experienced.  Mostly, they were members of active groups  from different parts of the country, but they were smugly bingo-free.  There were about thirty of us, from a variety  of backgrounds and a good mix of ages and accents.  All rather white and anglo-looking,  however.  I understand that this  fascination with the unseen is more common in murky Northern Europe than it is  in brighter latitudes, so these damp, foggy islands are good spawning ground for  Paranormal fans.  
As a cohort, we spanned the  sartorial continuum from slightly bohemian, through sensible sweaters, right  across to urban sharp.  For me, it was a  Weird Fish weekend.  I liked to think of  myself as outdoor elegant.  Appearances  and backgrounds apart, we all had in common an intellectual curiosity, as  opposed to the experience-seeking focus I had met previously when out with the  Spirit Fans.
It was a joy to hear at last  some lucid discussion.  Over morning  coffee, slightly over-stimulated, I found myself chatting with strangers about  whether or not Science was a religion.   Over afternoon tea, I heard the hilarious tale of how a medium had been  observed having a long conversation with a rustling plastic bag.  
Some people do argue that  Science is a religion.  In National  Rational, Science is a deity.  We were  instructed to use stringent logical measures when investigating reported  phenomena, and only to report on that which can be accurately measured and  documented.  The silly fingers on the  glass routine, the dowsing rods and the medium are all to be discarded from the  investigation site because you cannot use something unproven or unreliable to  explore something else which is also an unknown.  
The kind of behaviour I had  witnessed when out and about with the Spirit Fans, where mediums led punters in  a story-making exercise, would never happen with National Rational.  Nor would they wave around the bizarre  equipment carried by some groups; measuring damp, dandruff, compost content and  tea bag fluctuation, all for the sake of looking technical.   If they investigate a location, they form a  plan based solely on whatever has been reported, trying to uncover the details  and, if possible, establish an explanation.   Therefore, if the witness complains of a ghostly draft, they will only  investigate the movement of air.  If a  witness has heard ghostly moans, they will only investigate sources of  sound.  Spirit fans, on the other hand,  would pile into any location with their whole repertoire of mediums, gadgets and  gizmos to see what might turn up.
We were told that we might  one day investigate a location in response to tales about or complaints of  paranormal activity. On the other hand, we might choose a project, in which we  could investigate one particular aspect of the paranormal world, such as, for  example, a wizard who perhaps claims the ability to summon mysterious showers of  lentils. 
 We were introduced to the basics of how to  interview witnesses, and we had a crash course in the psychology of warped  perceptions.  We were given careful  instruction in health and safety and in the ethical and legal guidelines which  we must follow if we ever want to claim we are operating as a part of that  organisation.  It was like a complicated  version of common sense.  Once the  paperwork is done, there seems to be a severely limited field of activity left  for the Strictly Scientific Investigator.   I will explain.
Suppose you were  investigating a report that every time Mrs Periwinkle switched off her TV at  11.00, she felt a ghostly hand touch hers.   After producing all the correct documentation and having a long chat with  Mrs P, you would observe her night time ritual.   According to National Rational’s worldview, you would most likely  discover that Mrs P has failed to notice that her voile curtain is charged with  static electricity and that it clings to her hand as she stands near it.  This is the kind of result they predict for  99.9% of domestic investigations, and it would indeed be an excellent outcome  for the beleaguered Mrs P, who would be able to change her soft furnishings and  then operate her TV with confidence.
I am delighted for all the  Mrs Ps out there, and proud to be connected, however loosely, to the kind of  people who are able to help them.  I  agree wholeheartedly that ghostly experiences most often have a mundane source,  and that having this made clear is both healthy and desirable.  I still, however, have  reservations:
National Rational suggests  that natural explanations can be found by listening to the witnesses then  examining the environment sensibly.  That  presupposes that all phenomena can be easily described or observed.  How would they cope with my Agnes?  Agnes jumped into my head on my first ever  night out with the Spirit Fans.  I knew  she was there, but it was my individual experience.  Nobody could have seen it or measured  it.  Many would not have believed  it.  How would they cope with that Nasty  Thing still mooching around in my childhood home?  I know, because I have experienced them, that  some events do not produce a physical trace we can observe and measure.  I also know that the very act of observation  changes the environment we are observing.   If investigators for National Rational only collect tangible, measurable  data then they will have many, many successes, but they will also exclude  themselves from poking about in a whole raft of other, more subjective  phenomena.  Nobody could have put this  better than Mrs Essex, who, towards the end of Saturday afternoon exclaimed, ‘So  what exactly can we do then?  It looks  like we can’t do anything except just sit there watching!’  
 All year, I have felt the tension between  conflicting world views.  In one world  nothing needs to be proven; there are mystical layers of a Spirit World, Mr  Spouter and all the little Spouters interpret the unseen for us with  unchallenged authority and naughty young men secretly push upturned glasses  around scratched tabletops.  It is a  world full of wonder and hope for its fun-loving inhabitants.  
In the other, rational  world, the atmosphere is congenial.   Jokes are funnier; the conversation is more interesting.  Apparently paranormal effects generally have  natural causes.   The only authority is  that which resides in empirical Science.   Unknown entities and ethereal energies may or may not exist, but,  whichever way, if they cannot be observed and measured, they just do not count.  
At this point I hear an echo  from History Land.  Here, the lives of  active females over a few thousand years may have been vivid and important, but,  until comparatively recently, they just did not count.  If the acts and creations of the females  could not meet the criteria of the male context then they were automatically  invisible or worthless.  What an odd  connection to make.  I did not expect  that.
So, there are two starkly  different worlds.  I do not want to live  completely in either of them.  Talking  with some of the Para-types on the course, I started to realise that they did  not want this, either.  They were  independent thinkers.  Everyone I spoke  to had other interests and experiences which went beyond the purist parameters  of National Rational’s world view.  They  inhabited a middle ground, using empiricist methods when required by  circumstances. 
 Empiricism is like a motorway system.  It is fast and straight and it goes a long  way.  There are, however, whole stretches  of Geography quite far away from the motorway.   Sometimes, a b-road is the only route; you just might want to be choosy  about which ones you use.
  
I would like to continue  with National Rational.  The weekend  taught me that their contribution is a method, not a philosophy.  Methods, you have to learn, then use or not  use.  Philosophies, you just have to  figure out for yourself.